From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Heller Subject: Re: org-capture: Formatting of entries Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:30:24 -0700 Message-ID: References: <874ogk2ve7.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58481 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OU2zg-0003D5-5A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:30:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU2zb-0006sp-0i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:30:48 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:44445) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU2za-0006si-Pr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:30:42 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU2zX-0002iK-7B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:30:39 +0200 Received: from mail.cdrd.ca ([142.103.191.98]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:30:38 +0200 Received: from hellerm2 by mail.cdrd.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:30:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <874ogk2ve7.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 6/30/2010 12:05 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote: > Markus Heller writes: > > Hi Markus, > >> No, adding a space between "\n" and ":PROPERTIES:", ":Created", and >> ":END:" does just that, it adds a space, but does NOT yield the proper >> indent. This becomes more obvious when you refile a capture note to a >> second-level headline. >> >> Any other ideas/suggestions? > > I've suggested a more generic approach to specify properties in capture > templates. Have a look at the thread starting with the message > <877hlqetr8.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de>. > > Of course, that's only a suggestion and nothing of that is > implemented... ;-) Ah, thank you. I skimmed the thread earlier but didn't catch everything. Let's keep our fingers crossed that your suggestions (or a variation thereof) will be implemented; IIRC, Carsten mentioned something along these lines. Thanks Markus