From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Subject: Re: Poll: Who is using these commands Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 15:26:35 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20100508202159.GA32505@taupan.ath.cx> <4BE5DF9C.909@gmail.com> <245881E6-B69D-4E6F-A1B1-C4EFA39AF7BC@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1OB7T5-0005ry-4x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 10:26:55 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42299 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OB7T2-0005qJ-PS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 10:26:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OB7T1-0004wn-Ja for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 10:26:52 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:49150) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OB7T1-0004wP-Cv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 10:26:51 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OB7Sy-0001yK-B9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 16:26:48 +0200 Received: from cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([86.9.122.85]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 May 2010 16:26:48 +0200 Received: from sdl.web by cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.cmbg.cable.ntl.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 May 2010 16:26:48 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2010-05-09 12:43 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: > what do you think about C-M-f, C-M-b, C-M-n, C-M-p as alternative > bindings? These seem to make *a lot* of sense, because, as many here > have pointed out, they are so much better repeatable (Keep C-M- down, > press the character.) It is terrible idea to override these parenthesis movement bindings. They are universal in all editing modes that if overridden people who also use other emacs packages will be surprised. For example to move from a open parenthesis to a closing parenthesis. However, it makes sense to bind C-M-a and C-M-e to move the the beginning/end of a subtree. I don't use these org movement bindings much because isearch does the job perfectly and it can be used everywhere. Leo -- CCL-USER> _