From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Pluim Subject: bug#34684: 26.1; Strange characters when inserting date Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2019 15:25:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83h8cnkdc5.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhqfit5u.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0naj30v.fsf@gnu.org> <837ediit4b.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39038) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzjDs-0007Qu-6V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 09:33:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzj6w-0001Mp-Io for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 09:26:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42411) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzj6w-0001Me-F6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 09:26:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gzj6w-0004bk-2X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 09:26:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <837ediit4b.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 01 Mar 2019 16:09:24 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Philip.Wong@warwick.ac.uk, 34684@debbugs.gnu.org Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Robert Pluim >> Cc: Philip.Wong@warwick.ac.uk, 34684@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2019 14:47:21 +0100 >>=20 >> > That's only so if the above produces the same garbled result as in the >> > original report. Does it? >>=20 >> Didn=CA=BCt I send this yesterday? >>=20 >> $ LANG=3Dzh_HK src/emacs -Q -l ss.el >> (require 'org) >> (org-time-stamp) >> <2019-03-01 =E4=BA=94> >>=20 >> I think '=E4=BA=94' is 'Five', but don=CA=BCt quote me on that. > > This is not garbage by any measure. Please compare with what the OP > reported. We are miscommunicating. I was demonstrating that in my setup, org-time-stamp produces the correct output =3D> it=CA=BCs a configuration issue. > What, if anything, is wrong with the OP's configuration is exactly the > issue here. Right. Robert