From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Thomas S. Dye" Subject: Re: org-plus-contrib, where is library-of-babel.org? Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 07:53:51 -1000 Message-ID: References: <87fue58v9p.fsf@gmx.us> <87a84d37me.fsf@kyleam.com> <87pod83h5y.fsf@bzg.fr> <87k23f7036.fsf@gmx.us> <87mv7tkb7h.fsf@kyleam.com> <87o9s5yjii.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36258) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1damzE-0002mU-D7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:54:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1damz9-0006uD-DO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:54:12 -0400 Received: from gproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([69.89.20.122]:34883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1damz9-0006m5-6f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:54:07 -0400 Received: from cmgw3 (unknown [10.0.90.84]) by gproxy9.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F311E0710 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:53:57 -0600 (MDT) In-reply-to: <87o9s5yjii.fsf@gmx.us> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Aloha Rasmus, I agree, and believe the best course forward is to resolve the licensing of library-of-babel.org (which appears not to be problematic) and include the file in the emacs distribution. When I asked on the list for advice how to install library-of-babel.org from Worg, there was no response, which suggests to me that few users actually work out a way to install it from Worg. All the best, Tom Rasmus writes: > Kyle Meyer writes: > >> Hi Bastien and Rasmus, >> >> Any further thoughts on this? If we're still not sure what to do with >> the file, I'd vote that we remove it from Emacs for now so that we don't >> let an unlicensed file sit in the Emacs repo. > > If it's to be referred in the manual it should be there IMO. Otherwise, > it could be removed from both places. > > I personally don=E2=80=99t understand how it would be more convenient to = host it > on Worg. > > Nonetheless, I do not feel strongly against removing it. > > Rasmus -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com