From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id UKx3E+rFr2DpYAAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 18:16:42 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id cB0iD+rFr2DXFAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 16:16:42 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5DB52BB5C for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 18:16:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56708 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmIgZ-0001Dd-BA for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 27 May 2021 12:16:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmIbX-0003Gl-Dt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2021 12:11:27 -0400 Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:34468) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmIbV-0004Vo-S1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2021 12:11:27 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lmIbS-0003Wk-R9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2021 18:11:22 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org From: Maxim Nikulin Subject: Re: [PATCH] org-faq.org: Expand "What is the best setup for indenting?" Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 23:11:17 +0700 Message-ID: References: <2940818.1621565140@apollo2.minshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 In-Reply-To: <2940818.1621565140@apollo2.minshall.org> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: 28 X-Spam_score: 2.8 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam_report: (2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1622132202; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=P0OCtA+Ag9zXzalGczrjFEJ62CcdXdUt37DOGYElVE4=; b=DDELJEi2B7w7eJuZxWvlgB3cVF71rP4P8s3XrH8mn0WZAVulQt2HkAVEQel2t0txQCFk5e WK9629i1WsS0t7VZUAGPLv7hogss9GK/3BhibCJTYjC1QEE7u56mUYxvtiGIwlHaGGXTlx 0DfHGRTSOi0ACcfagsZcdGGtqWAmsVKAwNMSSbUbCIJRjE18Hj00TQmPCk5iLR9qJPqreB RZaWoYrPHQ0sxkkrpBU1vqNa6a7qzijHcWs1qIOt1N42QWGE1z2ia6YPphb7E3Cu1kYBa9 Du1aasv7Kd1vZui0ATxdtxtYQofkrcqePnm9Io9plCGu0gcErwLICgdcsy/H5Q== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1622132202; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=USleh2WP1WZvcKlDVLRhFlNblx5mDzImDrypZZQM/tr53bSiqK5Sz6OO/EUU10eJovv/t8 pPYQr+CBBcIQ4tNEqfESvczvSsfVa50YrfMQuPoJDd+OFF8lUuQbJsCArhuuUmWNH2uO79 QqilUeINiqf6rlQaSYPoEYq7i1Bzpe5e2sagVYqKPbUHEivxCUki7b9JwIZ9VRFJ4W8Vo2 r9cW2iKGpEf0kagqkQgcCewQp+mtgbvcT4QrM3OYnfbepTrMCTrYgvI0GEOxu+0TPCeq73 HnLPlfLM/KdEkqmx2+EkGtgt32OZdQiVW3+0CyFvFGV/aUXdmCciI8jQfYL+FA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.83 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B5DB52BB5C X-Spam-Score: -1.83 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 8T3M5liFPD4D Hi Greg, Bastien merged that patch just before I was going to modify it in response to your suggestions. I think, 3 commits is too much noise in git history for the single item in FAQ. However I can to prepare one more correction. Maybe you have got a better idea how to avoid confusion with Org versions in the tables. On 21/05/2021 09:45, Greg Minshall wrote: > >> I have no idea how to express it in a better way. The tables are same >> for Org >= 9.5 and for Org < 9.5 (modulo bugs in indentation fixed in >> 9.4.6). Only default configuration evolves in time. > > again, i apologize. my confusion was in not having read the text to > understand that the "(Org >= 9.5)" was the default. i assumed it meant, > "this is the behavior for Org >= 9.5", even though that meant the tables > really didn't make sense. if you wanted to compensate for such a "user > feature" :), maybe remove "(Org >= 9.5)", and add that information as a > short "NB:" line after each table? ... > sorry, i should have caught *both* "relatively". i'd suggest > >> a. "do not indent anything", >> "always indent relative to the element above", >> "indent just ~PROPERTIES/LOGBOOK~ drawers relative >> to the current heading level" > > which klings better to my ears. (sadly, i can't explain any grammatical > reason why, though.)