From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Stegemann Subject: Re: Return on a task behaves like TAB Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:23:20 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87eiyeyqzw.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LV0SN-0001xv-93 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 04:23:35 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LV0SM-0001xU-AF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 04:23:34 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54483 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LV0SL-0001xR-T0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 04:23:33 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:59311 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LV0SL-0002Yd-HY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 04:23:33 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LV0SG-00041Y-OE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:23:28 +0000 Received: from london.zeitform.net ([146.140.213.100]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:23:28 +0000 Received: from ulf-news by london.zeitform.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:23:28 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Bernt, Bernt Hansen wrote: > ... > ** Some Task... > ** Another task... > ... > > and I want to add detail at the end of 'Some Task'. What I used to do > was just put the point at the beginning of the line for ** Another Task > and then hit RETURN to insert a blank line and move up to it to add > detail. just as a side note: wouldn't it be better to use C-o (`open-line') instead of RET (`newline')? This would leave the cursor probably where you want it to be without the need for an additional C-p. Ulf