Org maintenance
This document describes the tasks the Org-mode maintainers have to do and how they are performed.
Current maintainers
Carsten Dominik created Org and is still active on the list.
Bastien Guerry has been the maintainer between 2011 and 2024. He hosts the orgmode.org website and the tracker on his server.
Ihor Radchenko is the official maintainer since December 2024.
Kyle Meyer is backporting patches made against Org in the Emacs repository and he updates the Emacs repository with Org latest releases ; he also hosts the public-inbox of the mailing list at list.orgmode.org.
Timothy (aka “TEC”) and Tim Cross are contributor stewards: they make sure that all contributions get the attention they deserve.
A team of Org users is moderating the mailing list.
Some files have a dedicated maintainer: just grep ;; Maintainer
in
Org’s repository to find them.
Web presence of maintainers
The recommended way to contact the Org maintainers is by sharing your question, patch or bug report on the mailing list.
Some maintainers have account on websites like github.com, reddit.com, stackoverflow.com, etc. It may be useful sometimes to add them to your conversations. Beware that, if the conversation leads to a bug fix or a change, this will have to be discussed on the mailing list. Here is a table with the accounts of the current maintainers:
Name | Stackoverflow | GitHub | GitLab | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bastien | bzg | bzg | bzg | bzg |
Ihor | yantar92 | yantar92 | ||
Timothy | tecosaur | tecosaur |
What is the role of a maintainer?
If you speak Emacs lisp and are a regular user of an Org file, please consider becoming a maintainer for it: you can simply ask on the list.
You do not need to be an expert of the functionality in the file or to actively improve the file. Just take care of bug reports and feature requests against this file by participating to the discussion on the list.
You are not strictly required to follow the mailing list closely and watch for the relevant emails. When necessary, the relevant messages will be directly forwarded to your email.
As a maintainer, you will need to join the Emacs group on Savannah. When this is done, you will have access to the org-mode.git repository and will be able to push changes without asking for permission first. If your change is a new feature, discuss it on the list first.
In case the change touches files maintained by other maintainers, ask them to review and validate it first. If Org’s maintainer disagrees with a change, he can ask you to revert it.
When possible, please accompany bug fixes and new features with tests. The Org test infrastructure is detailed in testing/README file in the Org repository.
If you are the maintainer of one of the babel language backends, please make sure that the language documentation in WORG is up-to-date.
See also this steps for your first commit as a maintainer.
General guidelines for Org maintenance
We have a set of rules to follow when maintaining Org mode. Exceptions can be made, but we try our best to follow the rules as closely as possible.
- Do not break user experience
- Keep old
.org
files working - Do not remove features
- Do not change established workflows
- Do not force users to upgrade configuration
- Keep old
- If we do need to break things, make the transition easy
- Notify users (in
ORG-NEWS
) - Provide functions and/or UI to simplify migration
- Notify users (in
- Keep Org a simple text markup
- Org should remain readable and legit as plain text
- Org should be easy to write, even outside Emacs
- In Emacs, opening an Org file first time (with defaults) should present a simple outline/markup text file
What’s in a release?
We don’t follow a release schedule
Org development is the work of volunteers and we cannot promise to follow a release schedule. You can support the work of contributors through the Org Mode Liberapay team.
We don’t use semantic versioning
We use the same numbering convention than semantic versioning, but we don’t follow the rules of SemVer, as expressed in semver.org.
A major release (e.g. 10
) means: “Hear ye, hear ye! All users should
pay attention and read the release notes before upgrading!”.
A minor release (e.g. 10.1
) means: “Hear ye, hear ye! Power users and
Org contributors should pay attention and read the release notes before
upgrading! All other users are welcome to read them too.”
This de facto convention has been made explicit after 9.4
.
What’s in major, minor and bugfix releases?
- Major release
- The release number for a major release look like
this:
10
. Major releases are made whenever Org is in a state where the feature set is consistent and we know that the features that are implemented will be supported in the future. Major releases have release notes published on https://orgmode.org/Changes.html. - Minor release
- The release number for minor releases look like
this:
10.1
. Minor releases are amends to main releases: small new features or bugfixes. Minor releases have release notes published on https://orgmode.org/Changes.html. - Bugfix-only releases
The release number for bugfixes-only releases looks like this:
10.1.1
. These releases contain no new feature at all, big or small. Fixes in these releases are either critical or trivial, for both the core code and the tests.This is because Org bugfix releases should always be ready to be sync’ed with Emacs development version and we don’t want to worry about adding non-critical and non-trivial changes there when Emacs comes close to a release.
Org releases are compatible with the latest three major Emacs releases
We aim at keeping the latest stable version of Org compatible with the last three major releases of Emacs.
For example, if the latest release of Emacs is 28.x, you can expect the latest release of Org to be compatible with Emacs 28.x, 27.x and 26.x, but not with Emacs 25.x.
It does not mean that Org will not be usable, at least partially, with older Emacsen: but maintainers are not bound to fix bugs reported on them.
Some Org components also depend on third-party packages available through package archives. Org is only guaranteed to be compatible with the latest stable versions of these third-party packages.
Org versions that are not yet released (from the main or bugfix branch) don’t come with any promise regarding compatibility.
Before any release, maintainers test the release against the last three major releases of Emacs.
Where can I track bugs, patches and updates?
On tracker.orgmode.org, which uses Woof! to advertize important changes (upcoming breaking changes, new releases), confirmed bugs, submitted patches and help requests.
Here is a super-quick Woof! primer:
- Patches sent to the mailing list are automatically tracked.
- To mark a patch as applied, you just need to place
Applied
at the beginning of your reply to the patch submitter. - Bugs reported to the list are not tracked until some confirms them
by placing
Confirmed
at the beginning of a line in his reply to the bug.
You don’t need to do much more: confirming bugs is a critical contribution.
You can check the Woof! howto if you want to explore the details.
Tests for the Org development branch
The main
branch of Org is tested against the three latest stable
versions of GNU Emacs every three hours, with these rules:
- If the repository didn’t change, don’t rerun the tests.
- If the repository changed, report new test failures to the org-build-failures mailing list.
- If the repository changed and the last test against a specific Emacs version failed, report new failures against the same Emacs version to bzg@gnu.org.
Tests are run using SourceHut build manifests called from the orgmode.org server. You can get the manifests files from the org-mode-tests repository.
For the release manager and core maintainers
Releasing a new version of Org
What goes on the bugfix
and main
branches
The git repository has two branches: main
for current development and
bugfix
for bug fixes against latest major or minor release.
Critical or trivial bug fixes always go on bugfix
and are merged on
main
. Non-trivial and non-critical fixes go on main
. New features
(e.g. new options) always go on main
.
The ;; Version:
header of the main
branch is set to the next stable
release suffixed by -pre
: e.g. 9.6-pre
. The ;; Version:
header of the
=bugfix
branch is set to the last stable release, e.g. 9.5.5
.
For all releases
The bugfix
branch should always be merged into main.
All releases are created from the bugfix
branch.
Always remember to set the ;; Version: [...]
metadata in org.el
correctly.
For bugfix releases
When doing a bugfix release (and only then), you should NOT merge the
main
branch into the bugfix
branch.
Security fixes trigger an immediate bugfix release. For other important fixes, we generally wait a week between bugfix releases. Whenever possible for the maintainers, we wait less than two weeks before releasing important fixes.
For minor and major releases
When doing a minor or major release, the main
branch should be merged
into the bugfix
branch. Before the merge, all the changes from Emacs
upstream should be ported to bugfix
(see Synchronization Org and
upstream Emacs).
:package-version
tags should be added to new and changed defcustom
statements as needed. If a statement also contains :version
tag, it
should be removed in favor of :package-version
.
FIXME
comments in the code should be reviewed before the release.
They often mark obsolete code to be removed in future releases.
The bugs listed on the bug tracker should be reviewed and possibly acted upon, especially feature regressions. Ideally, the bug tracker should be left with a minimal number of bugs listed.
etc/ORG-NEWS
file should be reviewed, and the most impacting changes
should be moved closer to the top, so that users can see them first
without reading through less impacting changes. The first heading
should be changed from Version X.Y (not yet released)
to Version X.Y
.
Emacs version requirements should be bumped according to the latest Emacs release version minus 2 (see Emacs version support).
The manuals and Changelog pages served at https://orgmode.org and WORG
will be automatically updated once the new version lands onto bugfix
branch.
At the very end, the new release should be announced on the mailing list, with subject appropriately tagged as announcement on the bug tracker. See an example in https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/87pmd6p7qs.fsf@gnu.org/. It is also a good idea share the release announcement on major Org mode/Emacs user forums, like /r/orgmode, /r/emacs, and Mastodon.
Preparing and annoncing the release
Bugfix releases don’t require specific annoucements.
Minor and major releases should be announced on the mailing list a few weeks in advance so that contributors can test the development branch and report problems.
When the release is done, it is announced on the mailing list.
Also, the contents of orgmode.org/Changes.html needs to be updated by
copying the first section of etc/ORG-NEWS
in the Changes.org
page of
the orgweb repository.
Synchronization Org and upstream Emacs
Below it is described how Org is kept in sync with the upstream Emacs.
Backporting changes from upstream Emacs
Sometimes Emacs maintainers make changes to Org files. The process of propagating the changes back to the Org repository is called backporting for historical reasons.
To find changes that need to be ported from the Emacs repository, look for commits in the Emacs repo that touched Org files since the last sync using the following command:
git log $rev..$target -- lisp/org \ doc/misc/org.org doc/misc/org-setup.org \ etc/ORG-NEWS etc/org etc/refcards/orgcard.tex etc/schema/
Here $target
is the Emacs branch of interest (e.g., emacs-29
), and
$rev
is the last commit ported from that branch.
There is also a feed to keep track of new changes in the lisp/org
folder in the Emacs repository.
A log of ported commits is kept at https://git.kyleam.com/orgmode-backport-notes.
Updating the Org version in upstream Emacs
New releases of Org should be added to the Emacs repository.
Typically, Org can be synchronized by copying over files from the
emacs-sync
branch of the Org repository to the master
branch of
Emacs repository. The emacs-sync
branch has a few extra changes
compared with the bugfix
branch. If the Emacs maintainers are
planning a new release of Emacs soon, it is possible that another
branch should be used.
If the new release of Org contains many changes, it may be useful to
use a separate branch before merging, e.g. scratch/org-mode-merge
.
This branch can then be merged with the master
branch, when
everything has been tested.
Please see CONTRIBUTE in the Emacs repository for guidelines on contributing to the Emacs repository.
- Where do files go
The following list shows where files in Org repository are copied to in the Emacs repository, folder by folder.
org-mode/doc
org.org
- Copy to
emacs/doc/misc
. org-setup.org
- Copy to
emacs/doc/misc
. orgcard.tex
- Copy to
emacs/etc/refcards
. Make sure that\def\orgversionnumber
and\def\versionyear
are up to date.
org-mode/etc
styles/*
- Copy to
emacs/etc/org
. etc/csl/*
- Copy to
emacs/etc/org
. schema/*.rnc
- Copy to
emacs/etc/schema
. schema/schemas.xml
- Any new entries in this file should be added
to
emacs/etc/schema/schemas.xml
. ORG-NEWS
- Copy to
emacs/etc
org-mode/lisp
- Copy
*.el
files toemacs/lisp/org
, exceptorg-loaddefs.el
! - You should create
org-version.el
inemacs/lisp/org
. The file is created when youmake
Org.
- Copy
- TODO
org-mode/testing
- Update
emacs/etc/NEWS
Whenever a new (major) version of Org is synchronized to the Emacs repository, it should be mentioned in the NEWS file.
Updating the list of hooks/commands/options on Worg
Load the mk/eldo.el
file then M-x eldo-make-doc RET
.
This will produce an org file with the documentation.
Import this file into worg/doc.org
, leaving the header untouched
(except for the release number).
Then commit and push the change on the worg.git
repository.
Copyright assignments
Assignment and verification
Maintainers need to keep track of copyright assignments. A list of contributors who have assigned copyright to the FSF is available so that committers can confirm whether a patch can be installed.
New contributors need to submit the form1 to the FSF.
The existing form, as previously pointed on emacs-devel, will be updated to include the line asking the secretary to send confirmation to interested parties (i.e. the Org maintainers). But it is not yet official. We need to get the form updated at its official site - Gnulib repository. See https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2024-03/msg00037.html
The assignment process does not always go quickly; occasionally it may get stuck or overlooked at the FSF. If there is no response to the contributor from FSF within a month2, the maintainers can ask the contributor to follow up with the FSF, CCing the Org maintainers.
Authorship information
When submitting a change on someone’s behalf, it’s important that the
author
field of the commit has the correct name and email address of
the person who authored the change. This may be done with the
--author
option:
git commit --author "Arthur D. Author <author@example.com>"
Making sure the author field corresponds to the contributor, and not the committer, helps us track the number of changed lines for contributors without FSF copyright assignment.
Footnotes:
The official response time is 5 business days, according https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html. We allow a bit more.